Then we can perform meta-analysis without data lost of included studies. With the draftsight software, we can always get the data exactly when papers were published with figures as the only source of outcome data. So we would prefer to recommend draftsight in general. As result of the meta-analysis, there was no statistically significant difference of precision between autocad and draftsight software for data extraction and both of them showed their satisfactory precision.Ĭonclusions: There is no difference of accuracy between the two software however, draftsight is small and exquisite in the practicality, which is more convenient than autocad. Results: We gained the data exactly from figures using the software. Meta-analyses were performed to compare precision between the two software, using original data from papers and the data extracted with autocad and draftsight. Differences in data extraction between researchers with the same software were previously compared and adjusted. Once you download and install DraftSight 2019 (free 30-day trial or. Autocad and draftsight were performed by different researchers, and data analysis was implemented by the third researchers, which were designed with blind method to avoid bias. Your account Autocad 2013 30 Day Trial will be downgraded to a free membership. Mean, 95% confidence interval (CI) and standard deviations (SD) were used as statistical parameters from figures to elevate the data extraction. Methods: We prepared ten figures together with original data from published papers, which would be used for the precision test. Objectives: To analyze and compare the precision of autocad and draftsight software for data extraction from figures by performing meta-analysis. However, is it accurate and reliable enough performing draftsight for data extraction? Draftsight is more convenient for using to extract data than autocad. We can use autocad and draftsight software to gain the data we needed when published figures as the only source of outcome data. PAHO - Iberoamerican Cochrane Network Award 2013īackground: None included studies in Systematic reviews can be lost to perform meta-analysis.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |